Session 5: Profile and Job description of the future FEI President

Tuesday, 1 April, 9.00 - 10.30

Following Ingmar De Vos’ commitment in his 2022-2026 presidential programme to provide clarity on the role of the future FEI President and ensure a structured review process prior to the election campaign for a new FEI President in 2026, the FEI President’s Succession Working Group (PSWG) was established by the FEI Board in November 2023 to evaluate the role in light of the FEI’s future needs. The Working Group is led by Chair of the Audit & Compliance Committee Janice Shardlow (GBR), with Chair of the Nominations Committee Elena Couttenye (VEN) and Emeritus Professor at the University of Lausanne Jean-Loup Chappelet (SUI) as members.

The Group’s mandate included defining the role’s scope and key competencies, and considering whether regulatory changes would be required to support the future of the position. After a number of meetings during 2024, the PSWG presented its findings to the FEI Board in November last year.

At today’s session focusing on the profile and job description of the future FEI President, PSWG Chair Janice Shardlow highlighted the responsibility of the National Federations in putting forward candidates with the future of the organisation in mind. She updated the Sports Forum on the PSWG’s work to date, and then handed over to James Carr, Executive Director of the Association of Summer Olympic International Federations (ASOIF), who provided insight into governance models across international sports federations, changes to the sporting ecosystem and the growing relevance of sport in society. He highlighted evolving challenges such as climate change, technological advancements, economic shifts, and increasing regulatory scrutiny. He underscored the importance of strong leadership, commercial adaptability, and maintaining credibility within the evolving global sporting landscape.

Carr further outlined how the role of the President of an international sports federation has evolved, detailing responsibilities, governance structures, and strategic initiatives. Different Presidential models among International Federations - honorary, supervisory and executive – were presented. James Carr emphasised that the FEI is a pioneering IF as the first to go through the process of preparing for a presidential election in such a holistic way, which he stated was the sign of a mature and sophisticated organisation.

Janice Shardlow provided a brief historical review of the past FEI presidencies. She presented the current presidential functions as per the FEI Statutes and Internal Regulations of the FEI as well as other functions  as approved by the FEI Board for the current President. The Session was then opened up for discussion from the floor.

In the ensuing debate consensus was reached that although the presidential role was clearly an executive one, representative and ambassadorial functions were also important components, which could not be disregarded. Executive qualifications were essential but any job description should not be made too demanding to avoid restricting the field of potential candidates.

Given the close cooperation between the President and the Secretary General, it was felt that their roles should be looked at in combination. The work of the current leadership team, including the strong links developed with the National Federations and stakeholders, was praised and preserving the success achieved to date – particularly with regard to welfare, sustainability and solidarity – as well as ensuring continuity with a new administration was a strong requirement.

Notes to Editors:

• May 2025 – PSWG reports to the FEI Board
• May–June – feedback consolidated by the PSWG
• June – proposal to be submitted to the FEI Board (in-person meeting)
• July – potential rule change proposals and/or job description to be submitted to National Federations for comments
• November – potential rule change proposals and/or job description to be voted on at the FEI General Assembly 2025 in Hong Kong in November.

FEI President Ingmar De Vos did not attend the Session to remain fully neutral and impartial on this important matter.