Athletes can be tested at events or out of competition. All testing is based on WADA’s International Standard for Testing & Investigations. This ensures that the sample collection procedure followed will be similar whether the sample is collected at a competition or out of competition and regardless of the country where the testing session is taking place.
A chaperone or Doping Control Officer (DCO) will show their accreditation and will ask to see the athlete’s identification. The athlete will be informed that they have been selected for testing and are requested to report to the Doping Control Station (DCS). The DCO will also explain the athlete’s rights and responsibilities.
Athletes have the right to:
Athletes have the responsibility to:
Once in the doping control station, sample collection begins. Athletes will be asked to provide a urine and/or blood sample.
For urine sample collection:
For blood sample collection:
Sometimes, blood is collected. The process is very similar:
For athletes who are minors or who have an impairment, specific modifications can be made to the testing process.
If there are any concerns about the doping control process, athletes can write them down on the DCF.
Once collected, the samples (urine or blood) are sent to a WADA-accredited laboratory confidentially (the laboratory has no way to know the athlete's name or nationality - all they see is the sample number).
If the A sample tests positive:
If the B sample tests positive:
If the B sample confirms the finding of the A sample, it is considered an alleged anti-doping rule violation (ADRV).
The fight against doping relies on several strategies, including the direct testing of athletes as well as evidence gathered in the context of non-analytical anti-doping rule violations. By combining these strategies, and seeking new ones to address emerging threats, the global fight against doping is more effective.
The typical testing approach, based on the detection of prohibited substances or their metabolites in an athlete’s sample, is an effective approach; but it has limitations when an athlete may be using substances on an intermittent and/or low-dose basis. In addition, new substances or modifications of prohibited substances (e.g. designer drugs) may be difficult to detect by conventional analytical means. In recent years, doping regimes have become much more scientifically planned and have taken advantage of the weaknesses in traditional protocols. Thus, the Athlete Biological Passport (ABP) complements the traditional anti-doping testing approach to enhance the cost-efficiency of anti-doping programs.
The fundamental principle of the Athlete Biological Passport (ABP) is to monitor selected variables (`biomarkers of doping´) over time that indirectly reveal the effect of doping, as opposed to the traditional direct detection of doping by analytical doping controls.
The ABP is currently composed of two modules:
The Haematological Module considers a panel of biomarkers of blood doping that are measured in an athlete’s blood sample. The Steroidal Module considers a panel of biomarkers of steroid doping measured in an athlete’s urine sample.
The objective of integrating the ABP into the larger framework of a robust anti-doping program is twofold:
1) To identify and target athletes for specific analytical testing by intelligent and timely interpretation of passport data;
2) To pursue possible anti-doping rule violations (ADRVs) in accordance with Article 2.2 (Use or attempted use by an athlete of a prohibited substance or a prohibited method) of the World Anti-Doping Code (Code).
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience.
By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.